On Apr 13, 2007 14:34 +0200, Andrei Maslennikov wrote: > what we are aiming at is a single mount point file system composed of one or > more first level subdirectories each of which is based on one standalone OSS > > capable to deliver around 1GB/sec of peak performance. This configuration > has an obvious "affinity" advantage of only partial damage in case of loss > of one of the OSS machines (only one of the first level subdirectories will > become unavailable).
Use "lfs setstripe 0 0 3" for directory for ost[0,1,2], "lfs setstripe 0 3 3" for directory for ost[3,4,5], etc. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Principal Software Engineer Cluster File Systems, Inc. _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
