On Tuesday 15 May 2007 03:23 pm, Robert LeBlanc wrote: > On 5/15/07 1:17 AM, "Harald van Pee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 15 May 2007 08:23 am, Andreas Dilger wrote: > >> On May 14, 2007 07:09 -0600, Robert LeBlanc wrote: > >>>> 3. applied all patches from > >>>> lustre-1.6.0.1/lustre/kernel_patches/series/2.6.18-vanilla.series > >>>> lustre-1.6.0.1/lustre/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6.18-vanilla.ser > >>>>i es > >> > >> You shouldn't really apply the ldiskfs patches to your kernel ext3. > >> Instead let the lustre build process build a new ldiskfs module with the > >> patches. > > > > o.k. thank you!
I think the hint above concerns just the case if you will apply the patches by hand with patch than you should not use the ldisk patch series, because its just needed for building the ldiskfs module and done during make if I understand it correct. Harald > > Is this different then what is in the documentation? All I have been doing > in creating symlinks for series and patches in the kernel source tree root. > I then run quilt and apply all the patches and build the kernel. I don't > link to the ldiskfs series because I didn't read that in the Install file. > > I then reboot with the new kernel and compile Lustre with just configure, > make, make install (well a little different to make Debian packages). So I > guess I'm not patching ext3 (although there still is a couple of patches > applied) and building a new ldiskfs module. > > Robert LeBlanc > BioAg Computer Support > Brigham Young University > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (801)422-1882 > > _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
