On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 15:18 -0400, Bret Hammond wrote: > A spec file to allow the > generation of both the lustre patched kernel and kernel-source rpms and/or > the kernel-devel rpms would come in handy.
We do supply a kernel-source rpm with every release. For example, for 1.4.11: kernel-smp-2.6.9-55.EL_lustre_1.4.11.x86_64.rpm kernel-source-2.6.9-55.EL_lustre_1.4.11.x86_64.rpm lustre-1.4.11-2.6.9_55.EL_lustre_1.4.11smp.x86_64.rpm lustre-debuginfo-1.4.11-2.6.9_55.EL_lustre_1.4.11smp.x86_64.rpm lustre-modules-1.4.11-2.6.9_55.EL_lustre_1.4.11smp.x86_64.rpm lustre-source-1.4.11-2.6.9_55.EL_lustre_1.4.11smp.x86_64.rpm lustre-tests-1.4.11-2.6.9_55.EL_lustre_1.4.11smp.x86_64.rpm Will a kernel-source not be a sufficient substitute for a kernel-devel package? Perhaps a short term solution would be to have our kernel-source package provide (in RPM Provides: nomenclature) a "kernel-devel" package to satisfy other RPMs that may Require: kernel-devel. I'm not entirely sure this is doable, just throwing it out as a possible solution. Cheers, b. _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
