Hello!

On Nov 14, 2007, at 10:57 AM, Wojciech Turek wrote:
> syslog on MDS server
> Nov 14 14:00:00 mds01 kernel: LustreError: 23667:0:(mds_open.c: 
> 1474:mds_close()) @@@ no handle for file close ino 24640839: cookie  
> 0xc5c8c9ecaec0f5ca  [EMAIL PROTECTED] x319994/t0 o35- 
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:-1  
> lens 296/560 ref 0 fl Interpret:/0/0 rc 0/0
> Nov 14 14:00:00 mds01 kernel: LustreError: 23667:0:(ldlm_lib.c: 
> 1437:target_send_reply_msg()) @@@ processing error (-116)   
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] x319994/t0 o35->e5064fef-6af2- 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:-1 lens 296/560 ref  
> 0 fl Interpret:/0/0 rc -116/0
> Nov 14 14:00:00 mds01 kernel: LustreError: 23667:0:(ldlm_lib.c: 
> 1437:target_send_reply_msg()) Skipped 4 previous similar messages
> Nov 14 14:04:32 mds01 kernel: LustreError: 23665:0:(mds_open.c: 
> 1474:mds_close()) @@@ no handle for file close ino 24640840: cookie  
> 0xc5c8c9ecaec10f38  [EMAIL PROTECTED] x324461/t0 o35- 
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:-1  
> lens 296/560 ref 0 fl Interpret:/0/0 rc 0/0
> Nov 14 14:04:32 mds01 kernel: LustreError: 23665:0:(ldlm_lib.c: 
> 1437:target_send_reply_msg()) @@@ processing error (-116)   
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] x324461/t0 o35->e5064fef-6af2- 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:-1 lens 296/560 ref  
> 0 fl Interpret:/0/0 rc -116/0
>
> syslog on relevant client
> Nov 14 14:00:00 bindloe01 kernel: LustreError: 11-0: an error  
> occurred while communicating with [EMAIL PROTECTED] The mds_close  
> operation failed with -116
> Nov 14 14:00:00 bindloe01 kernel: LustreError: 28428:0:(file.c: 
> 97:ll_close_inode_openhandle()) inode 24640839 mdc close failed: rc  
> = -116
> Nov 14 14:04:32 bindloe01 kernel: LustreError: 11-0: an error  
> occurred while communicating with [EMAIL PROTECTED] The mds_close  
> operation failed with -116
> Nov 14 14:04:32 bindloe01 kernel: LustreError: 28429:0:(file.c: 
> 97:ll_close_inode_openhandle()) inode 24640840 mdc close failed: rc  
> = -116

Sounds like there was previous client eviction nd evicted client had  
some files open.
On eviction MDS closes all file handles of ths client, but client  
thinks handles are still valid
After the client reconnected and tried to do something with those  
handles (closing the files), it discovers that file handles are no  
longer valid and those messages are printed.

> Could some one give me or point me to the information about a source  
> of errors above ?
> What error -116 means ?

errno 116 is ESTALE, you can see those values in /usr/include/asm- 
generic/errno.h and errno-base.h (for smaller values).

Bye,
      Oleg

_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

Reply via email to