Hi folks, Just spit balling some ideas in the lab here ... has anyone ever experimented with using Lustre as a storage backend for multiple conventional NAS protocols? i.e. configure a nominal Lustre environment, and configure each Lustre client as a Samba and/or NFS server?
Basically ... would Lustre be suited to front clustered storage for a number of clients that are otherwise incapable of running the Lustre software itself? If anyone's done something like this before, what kind of performance numbers did you see under nominal operating conditions? thanks, Klaus _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
