I believe this is still the case. It may work but your mileage will vary.
On Dec 13, 2007, at 11:58 AM, Marco wrote: > Hello everybody, > > at the following pages: > > http://www.rit.edu/~rc/docs/Survey_of_Clustered_Parallel_File_Systems_004_LANL.ppt > http://www.intel.com/cd/ids/developer/asmo-na/eng/dc/tools/threading/238284.htm?page=2 > > I read: > > "[...] Currently, one additional drawback to Lustre is that a Lustre > client cannot be on a server that is providing OSTs. This solution is > being worked on and may be available soon. [...]" > > Is that currently true? I mean, the client cannot be run on an OST > server yet? > > Thank you, > Marco > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss Aaron Knister Associate Systems Administrator/Web Designer Center for Research on Environment and Water (301) 595-7001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
