> some people use 1.4.x NFS servers right now Yes, for example the current version of HP's SFS product uses Lustre 1.4.6.4 (with patches) and supports NFS export *from 2.4 kernel nodes only* (because support for NFS export on 2.6 kernel requires later Lustre 1.4x stream code).
-----Original Message----- From: Oleg Drokin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19 December 2007 03:12 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre NFs expport Hello! On Dec 17, 2007, at 5:53 AM, Mertol Ozyoney wrote: > To my understanding (My knowledge on Linux is not broad) > We will have stable NFS export capabilities both for 1.4x and 1.6.x > with in > weeks? (Project will be istalled in februrary and NFS Gateways might > wait > till the end of fabruary) Yes, I think so. In fact some people use 1.4.x NFS servers right now and the most annoying problem so far is speed issue tracked in bug 13371. > Basically we will attach a Sun 25k to Lustre partition. > I plan to use 2x Gateway server each with IB to Lustre and 10 Gbit > ethernet > to 25k . Make sure you have enough bus bandwidth on the gateway for both connections. If you plan to run two separate instances of NFS servers to same lustre FS on same gateways, you need to come up with some way for sun25k (I presume it is single machine with many CPUs?) to use both NFS servers for same export. > PS: BTW do HP support IB loadbalancing with their version of Lustre? I do not know. I'm not even sure what IB loadbalancing is. Bye, Oleg _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
