Hi again, Discard my e-mail - I compiled to early in the morning and included the --enable-mindf option in configure. After re-reading the configure options and great help from adilger and scjody in #lustre I finally figured out that I was overseeing the whole stripe thing.
Best Regards, Timh 2008/2/12, Timh Bergström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi, > > Just got a smaller Lustre system running with 1 mdt/mgs and 2 ost's. On > the osts i've added 1x10GB disk and 1x20GB disk > on each system and formatted and mounted them as /mnt/ost1-4 (ost1) and > /mnt/ost2-3 (ost2). I've also mounted the lustre system on the mdt/mgs > server with mount -t lustre [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/testfs /mnt/lustre. So far so > good, however df -h only reports 9/60GB avail where lsf df -h reports > 54.4G available. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/testfs > 60G 50G 9.0G 85% /mnt/lustre > > vs > > filesystem summary: 59.1G 4.7G 54.4G 7% /mnt/lustre > > -- > > lustre-client:/mnt/lustre# du -hcs > 4.0K . > 4.0K total > > I cant find anything on this in the lists or manual, but do you have to > have equal size disks to get all the usable space available to the system > mounting lustre? Is this somehow connected to stripe-size or some automatic > failover settings. My original intent was to create a large storage area > using lustre for numerous clients to mount and use as diskspace. > > -- > Timh Bergström > System Administrator > Diino AB - www.diino.com > :wq -- Timh Bergström System Administrator Diino AB - www.diino.com :wq
_______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
