Craig Tierney wrote: > Andreas Dilger wrote: >> On Feb 13, 2008 14:49 -0700, Craig Tierney wrote: >>> I am trying to build lustre against and unsupported >>> kernel (2.6.20.20). I am having some issues with it. >> Do you really need this kernel on the servers, or could it be a >> supported patched kernel on the servers (e.g. RHEL5 2.6.18) and >> the 2.6.20.20 kernel patchless on the clients? >> >> Making new kernel patch series is not for the faint of heart, >> and is generally not worthwhile for an "older" kernel like this. >> We have patches for 2.6.22 in our CVS and in bugzilla, so any >> work to get 2.6.20 on the server would be lost effort. >> > > Thanks for all of the quick replies. I am happy to try 2.6.22. > Redhat kernels don't work for me (or at least, debugging their > problems isn't worth the effort). > > However, if I patch a 2.6.22 kernel from CVS, wont I have to > be using the CVS tree for the latest Lustre dev version? IE > I cannot just use the patches against 1.6.4.2 because I would > be dealing with the same problem as before (autogen.sh). > > Thanks, > Craig > > >
Please ignore this last comment. I see what needs to be done. Craig -- Craig Tierney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
