Hi I build successfully lustre and configured patchless client on kernel (2.6.20.15) and of lustre(1.6.4.2). I configured using ./configure --with-linux=/unpatched/kernel/source
and then I build using make and installed the modules using make install. Now in order to run the llmount.sh script,we require lmc,lconf utilities but these are not there in lustre 1.6 so how to proceed with starting a file system.(using MGS) Regards, Ashok Bharat -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 2/25/2008 10:30 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Lustre-discuss Digest, Vol 25, Issue 53 Send Lustre-discuss mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Lustre-discuss digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: 2.6.23 client systems with any compatible server (Jim Garlick) 2. Re: Help needed in building patchless client for lustre (Brian J. Murrell) 3. Re: Help needed in building patchless client for lustre (Brian J. Murrell) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 08:24:49 -0800 From: Jim Garlick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] 2.6.23 client systems with any compatible server To: Andreas Dilger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 09:19:27PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote: > > Could you also elaborate on the "1.6.4.* compatibility issue"? There > shouldn't be any compatibility problems between 1.6 releases, though > the current b1_6 development branch has a feature (adaptive timeouts) > which is likely to be removed before the final release. I would suggest > getting the specific Lustre release you want by CVS tag (v1_6_4_3 probably) > instead of the CVS tip. Andreas, are you saying adaptive timeouts are likely to be deferred to 1.8? Jim ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:32:21 -0500 From: "Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Help needed in building patchless client for lustre To: [email protected] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 13:10 +0530, ashok bharat bayana wrote: > hi! > I tried to build lustre-1.6.4.2 in my system, but the following error occured, > > /home/bharat/Desktop/lustre-1.6/lustre-1.6.4.2/lustre/lvfs/lvfs_linux.c:345: > error: too few arguments to function ?vfs_rename? This smacks of a Ubuntu kernel. Ubuntu Gutsy to be precise. If so, you will be out of luck. Ubuntu have added AppArmor to their kernel and that addition has resulted in a number of VFS API changes which we do not handle. > my kernel version is 2.6.22.14. Yeah, that looks like a Ubuntu kernel. b. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20080225/c125dc2c/attachment-0001.bin ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:33:30 -0500 From: "Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Help needed in building patchless client for lustre To: [email protected] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 02:54 -0500, Tom.Wang wrote: > add --disable-server when you configure patchless client. Just for the record on this thread, configure should detect an unpatched kernel source and assume "--disable-server" automagically. b. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20080225/cacb285a/attachment-0001.bin ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss End of Lustre-discuss Digest, Vol 25, Issue 53 **********************************************
_______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
