On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:55:19AM -0800, Joshua Bower-Cooley wrote: > Hi- > I've had lustre running happily for some time over a single 10g ethernet NIC > per node. After switching to dual 10g and creating a new filesystem > (1.6.4.2), I'm seeing nothing but keep-alive packets with bad checksums. > > What is the current "correct" way to do this now? The manual suggest not > using > bonding, but several list postings now reccommend it. Without bonding, do I > need to have my 2 switches stacked, or will Lustre recognize the division in > my subnet? > > LNET module options I've tried are: > 1) networks="tcp0(eth2,eth3)" > 2) ip2nets="tcp(eth2,eth3); tcp(eth2) 10.9.[1-4].*; tcp(eth3) 10.9.[5-8].*;" > and many other variations
Please use Linux bonding. Specifying multiple NICs under one tcp network is now a deprecated socklnd feature. Isaac _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
