Brennan wrote: > Forwarding. > > Begin forwarded message: > >> *From: *Brennan <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >> *Date: *March 6, 2008 2:36:44 AM PST >> *To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> *Subject: **Lustre Thumper Fault Tolerance* >> >> IHAC that wants about 150 TB usable of Thumpers+Lustre specifically to >> feed a compute cluster and use SAMFS to go to an SL3000. >> They want the Lustre filesystem to be at least single fault tolerant >> for a complete Thumper failure. They are willing to double the number of >> Thumpers to achieve this. What are the best practices for this >> configuration? >> >> Jim Brennan >> Digital Media Systems >> Sun Systems Group >> Universal City, CA >> (310)901-8677 > >
Why not use another Sun product other than Thumper to build a failover solution? Why not use the 6140's in pairs with the servers to get redundancy. Is this still more expensive than buying 2x Thumper nodes? Craig -- Craig Tierney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
