Andreas Dilger wrote: > This means you have on-disk corruption and an "e2fsck -f" is needed > (while filesystem is unmounted of course). > Yes I thought, I was curious about why is this could happen (if it's not a HW bug), were there any bug is lustre about this or something like that. The cluster was working for monthes without errors.
> You have quite an old version of lustre, and several ldiskfs bugs have > been fixed since then. I don't think it will BUG() on finding disk > errors anymore. > Thank you, this weekend we upgrade to the new version and to x86_64. tamas _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
