This would be for the MDS/MGS only, but thats good to know. Problem is our two MDS servers (active/passive) will have two connections each to the same lun, so there could be issues.
Brock Palen www.umich.edu/~brockp Center for Advanced Computing [EMAIL PROTECTED] (734)936-1985 On Jun 5, 2008, at 7:52 PM, Klaus Steden wrote: > > Hi Brock, > > I've got a Sun StorageTek array hooked up to one of our clusters, > and I'm > using labels instead of multi-pathing. We've got it hooked up in a > similar > fashion as Stuart; it's a bit "slow and sloppy" when initializing, > but it > works well enough and there are no problems once OSTs are online. > > Klaus > > On 6/5/08 3:57 PM, "Brock Palen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>did etch on stone > tablets: > >> Our new lustre hardware arrived from sun today. Looking at the duel >> MDS and FC disk array for it. We will need multipath. >> Has anyone ever used multipath with lustre? Is there any issues? If >> we set up regular multipath via LVM lustre won't care as far as I can >> tell and browsing archives. >> >> What about multipath without LVM? Our StorageTek array has dual >> controllers with dual ports going to dual port FC cards in the >> MDS's. Each MDS has a connection to both controllers so we will need >> multipath to get any advantage to this. >> >> Comments? >> >> >> Brock Palen >> www.umich.edu/~brockp >> Center for Advanced Computing >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> (734)936-1985 >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lustre-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
