On 10 Jun 2008, at 19:18, Jakob Goldbach wrote:

>
>>
>> My question is why not bigger values? What determines the max  
>> lru_size.
>>
>
> The number of clients and ram on servers.
Is there a recommendation for lustre servers how much max ram one can  
spend on locks?
>
>
> Locks are held by server and client caches "copies" of locks even if
> unused. A thousand node cluster each with a lru_size of 41000 would  
> mean
> a lot of locks on the servers.
I rather think of increasing lru_size only on few login nodes where  
user access file system interactively.

Wojciech
>
>
> /Jakob
>

_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

Reply via email to