On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 14:29 +0200, Heiko Schroeter wrote: > > Well yes ok, but what about the sizes of the partitions ? > > The docs present an example calculating the inode space needed on an 'MDS'. > (3.2.2 Calculating MDS Size)
That should technically be "MDT Size", not MDS size. > So when the MDS partitions AKA MDTs. > holds the inodes of the lustre system what will be > the partition size of the MDT device ? You are talking about two things that are in fact one and the same. The "MDS partition" is the MDT. > Or should it read 'MDT' partition size in the docs and the MDS partition size > doesn't matter at all ? Indeed. Can you file a bugzilla ticket regarding that that bad use of MDS? I will see that it gets to the documentation team. Thanx, b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
