Awesome. We'll try it and let you know. Of course, if it works, we'll have a naming dilemma - "The Dilger Procedure" is already taken. :)
Thanks, Charlie Taylor UF HPC Center On Jul 17, 2008, at 7:00 PM, Andreas Dilger wrote: > > This is an indication that some object is missing on the OST that one > or more clients is trying to access. You can look at the Lustre debug > logs with "rpctrace" enabled to extract the "Handling RPC" and > "Handled RPC" > messages on the thread printing this message, e.g.: > > 00000100:00100000:0:1216234365.071325:1536:32091:0:(service.c: > 1064:ptlrpc_server_handle_request()) Handled RPC pname:cluuid > +ref:pid:xid:nid:opc ldlm_cn_00:01318c63- > cfd4-9199-8142-4e41ea812bd3+7:32099:x9:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:101 > 00000100:00100000:0:1216234366.071325:1536:32091:0:(ldlm_resource.c: > 719:ldlm_resource_add()) lvbo_init failed for resource 5820180: rc -2 > 00000100:00100000:0:1216234367.071325:1536:32091:0:(service.c: > 1064:ptlrpc_server_handle_request()) Handled RPC pname:cluuid > +ref:pid:xid:nid:opc ldlm_cn_00:01318c63- > cfd4-9199-8142-4e41ea812bd3+7:32099:x9:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:101 > > > is PID 32091, from the client "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" (in this made up example a > local client). > Then you can check on the client (also with "vfstrace" and "rpctrace" > debugging on) what it was trying to do on the thread that requested > this > RPC (PID 32091, XID "9" in this example). > > To quiet it, the easiest mechanism is probably to just delete this > file. > If it is a small file (< 1MB) and the data is still valid you could > copy > it to another file and rename it over the old one. > > Cheers, Andreas > -- > Andreas Dilger > Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group > Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc. > _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
