On Sat, 2008-07-26 at 12:56 -0400, Mag Gam wrote: > Robin, > > Thankyou very much for helping with this. > > I want to try kernel 2.6.25 or even 2.6.26. But its not a big deal, I > just patched my distro kernel and everything seems to work well. > I am hoping in the future lustre will become a deamon or a module > instead of patching the actual kernel source code. This is causing too > many pains
Seriously, this whole thing is a lot, lot, less painful if you just run one of our supported distros on your MDS and OSSes (i.e. you can simply install RPMs to get up and going). Your MDS and OSS should be "sealed server" type dedicated machines that do nothing else but serve metadata and file objects (respectively) so getting a bleeding edge kernel on them should not be a requirement. b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
