LMAO. Thanks Brian :-) I guess I am a little too demanding in this timeless world. My apologies. But how long does it take to get updated on the list archives?
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Brian J. Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 00:03 -0400, Mag Gam wrote: >> Is it me, or the Lustre Discuss mailing list very slow to post >> messages? It takes me over 2-3 days to get a message approved and then >> be posted in the archives? > > This particular message sent by you was received by google Sat, 02 Aug > 2008 21:03:46 -0700 (PDT): > > Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so1874215rvb.14 for > <[email protected]>; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 21:03:46 -0700 > (PDT) > > It was then received by lists.lustre.org at Sat, 02 Aug 2008 21:03:49 > -0700 (PDT): > > Received: by lists.lustre.org (Postfix, from userid 60001) id > 2AB284E6253; > Sat, 02 Aug 2008 21:03:49 -0700 (PDT) > > It was then received (for delivery to me) by Sun at Sun, 03 Aug 2008 > 04:09:31 +0000 (Z) > > Received: from lists.lustre.org ([70.42.188.14] [70.42.188.14]) by > relay22i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-21010455; Sun, 03 Aug 2008 > 04:09:31 > +0000 (Z) > > (which is 21:09:31 PDT). > > and many hops later, landed in my mailbox at Sat, 02 Aug 2008 21:09:44 > -0700 (PDT): > > Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.34.119]) by > sfbay5-mail1.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 > (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 21:09:44 > -0700 (PDT) > > So assuming clocks are in sync, 2 seconds short of 6 minutes. Not too > bad. > > b. > > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > > _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
