Thanks Klaus! Looks like I will go that route too...The performance is unreal.
TIA On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Klaus Steden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello Mag, > > Some people on-list have tried it before, but it generally performs poorly. > I believe HP contributed some optimizations, but the consensus as recently > as the start of this year was that it will generally suck. Check the list > archives for more information, I believe CIFS was a better performer. > > If you're exporting to Linux clients, going with native Lustre clients is > definitely a better option than using NFS (although you may not be doing > so). > > cheers, > Klaus > > On 8/5/08 7:25 PM, "Mag Gam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>did etch on stone tablets: > >> Is there a guide for Lustre and NFS? At our university, we have a >> lustre server which also exports NFS data. We are using Centos, and I >> was wondering if there are any tuning and best practices guides >> available. >> >> TIA >> _______________________________________________ >> Lustre-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > > _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
