On Aug 18, 2008 17:18 -0700, Klaus Steden wrote: > Hrm. Who should I contact to find out more, then?
Nathan is working on the Changelog code, but I think the main issue is that neither of us know what "compliant with Trusted Computing standards" really means. > On 8/18/08 4:44 PM, "Andreas Dilger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>did etch on stone > tablets: > > > On Aug 18, 2008 12:53 -0700, Klaus Steden wrote: > >> Will this be compliant with Trusted Computing standards? i.e. will it be > >> possible to use this information for auditing purposes? > > > > I don't know enough about that to make a useful answer, sorry. > > > >> On 8/18/08 3:43 AM, "Andreas Dilger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>did etch on stone > >> tablets: > >> > >>> On Aug 09, 2008 05:06 -0700, daledude wrote: > >>>> Is there is a tool that shows what files are being accessed? Sort of > >>>> like inotify, but not inotify? I'd like to compile file access > >>>> statistics to try and balance the most accessed files across the OST's > >>>> better. > >>> > >>> There is a feature being worked on for Lustre 2.0 called "Changelogs" > >>> that will allow recording all files that are modified. > >>> > >>> Cheers, Andreas > >>> -- > >>> Andreas Dilger > >>> Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group > >>> Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc. > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Lustre-discuss mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > > > > Cheers, Andreas > > -- > > Andreas Dilger > > Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group > > Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc. > > Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc. _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
