On Sep 19, 2008 20:46 -0400, Mag Gam wrote:
> I am not sure what work around you are speaking about.
You mentioned in your email that this is likely the statahead issue
from previous threads. Most of those had proposed a workaround:
echo 0 > /proc/fs/lustre/llite/{fsname}/statahead_max
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Andreas Dilger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sep 17, 2008 07:24 -0400, Mag Gam wrote:
> >> This happened again :-(
> >>
> >> ANyone have any insight on a problem similar to this?
> >>
> >> TIA
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Mag Gam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Is this a known issue? Could this be a statahead
> >> > issue mentioned in the previous threads?
> >
> > Probably yes, so trying the workarounds previously mentioned in those
> > emails will tell us whether this is the same problem or not.
> >
> > Cheers, Andreas
> > --
> > Andreas Dilger
> > Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
> > Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
> >
> >
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
