Hi I have setup luster as following
MGS/MDT/ost0/client- running on a x86_64 server with RHEL5.2 kaveri.hpc.com 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5_lustre.1.6.5smp OST1/client - running on x86_64 server with RHEL5.2 gangotri 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5_lustre.1.6.5smp Above setup is seems to be working fine, I have tested it with dd, it shows throughput as 54.5 MB/s Now I want to connect another Linux(RHEL4.4) client which is running on as 32 bit VM on ESX 3.5 I have installed following rpm on client lustre-1.6.5-2.6.9_67.0.7.EL_lustre.1.6.5smp.i686.rpm lustre-modules-1.6.5-2.6.9_67.0.7.EL_lustre.1.6.5smp.i686.rpm and modified NIS configuration(yp.conf, ypbind), hosts file and appended modprobe.conf with #Networking options, see /sys/module/lnet/parameters NO ../lnet/parameters dir options lnet networks=tcp0(eth0) But when I am trying to mount its giving following error [EMAIL PROTECTED] lustre-client]# mount -t lustre [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/spfs /mnt/spfs mount.lustre: mount [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/spfs at /mnt/spfs failed: No such device Are the lustre modules loaded? Check /etc/modprobe.conf and /proc/filesystems Note 'alias lustre llite' should be removed from modprobe.conf Is there any compatibility issue or any mis-configuration? I m not able to figure out what is wrong? Please comment Regards Deval -----Original Message----- From: Deval Kulshrestha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 1:57 PM To: 'lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org' Subject: HI Kevin Thanks for your reply. Now I can set it up. Regards Deval Message: 9 Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 05:46:27 -0600 From: Kevin Van Maren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Test setup configuration To: Deval kulshrestha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Deval kulshrestha wrote: > > Hi > > > > I am a new luster user, trying to evaluate luster with few > configuration. I am going through luster 1.6 Operation manual. But I > am not able to understand which package should be installed on MDS, > OSS , and client. > > Should I install all the packages on all three types of nodes? > > > > Please explain > > > > Best Regards > > Deval K > Lustre servers (MDS/OSS): kernel-lustre-smp // patched server kernel lustre-modules // Lustre kernel modules lustre // user space tools (server) lustre-ldiskfs // ldiskfs e2fsprogs // filesystem tools You can install all those RPMs on the client as well, but it is not necessary. Lustre clients (assuming you have the matching vendor kernel for the lustre-modules installed): lustre-client-modules // kernel modules for client lustre-client // user space (client) Kevin ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss End of Lustre-discuss Digest, Vol 33, Issue 12 ********************************************** No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.7.6/1715 - Release Date: 10/8/2008 7:19 PM =========================================================== Privileged or confidential information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), please delete this message and kindly notify the sender by an emailed reply. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Progression and its associate entities shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by them. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Progression Infonet Private Limited, Gurgaon (Haryana), India Authorised dealer of PostMaster, by QuantumLink Communications Pvt. Ltd Get your free copy of PostMaster at http://www.postmaster.co.in/ _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss