I have been doing some real world comparisons between the two for a while now, as we were/are using GlusterFS in production, but 2.0 is much slower than 1.4.0RC and lost MAC support...
If you would like details, I can put together my numbers and such and mail them to you, just drop me some email directly, as I think the lustre people don't want us talking gluster in here. Oh, and we are most likely going to move to lustre, if that helps out for now :) ----- "Nick Jennings" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Guys, > > Sorry if this is the wrong place to post this, but I was wondering > if > anyone has any thoughts on GlusterFS? It seems kind of like a > user-space > version of Lustre, not cut out for huge clusters, but well suited for > > smaller clusters without some of the resource requirements of Lustre. > > I know it's not specifically Lustre related, but I don't know of a > better list of experts to post my questions to :) > > -Nick > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
