On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 12:07 +0000, Daire Byrne wrote: > Robert, Hi Daire,
> One thing that may or may not be useful (!) would be be a Lustre yum > repository. I'm afraid our current Lustre distribution policy is distribution through the SDLC only. > Then perhaps we can get upgrades and recommended software > versions automatically and easily. Yeah, catalogued repositories would make maintenance easier, indeed. > You could even go the whole way and create a > Lustre distro based on CentOS and provide a CD for download (e.g. > AsteriskNow). We do. You are describing the Sun HPC software stack. b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
