On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 09:06 -0700, Shi Jin wrote: > Thank you very much.
You are welcome. > I actually wanted to build the lustre module for my kernel. But when I tried > to download the lustre-source, the RPM comes with is a specific kernel > version associated with it. Is it OK for me to download the source where the > kernel version from the file name is different from the kernel version I am > using? Indeed, it is. That brings up an interesting point in the naming of the lustre-source RPM though. I will give this some thought. > Specifically, shall I get > lustre-client-source-1.6.7-2.6.16.60_0.31_lustre.1.6.7_bigsmp.i686.rpm? (but > its kernel version does not match mine) Or shall I get > rhel5-i686-client-lustre-1.6.7.tar.gz (is it different from > sles10-i686-client-lustre-1.6.7.tar.gz?)? Does rhel5 covers all minor version > changes such as rhel5.3? You should get the lustre-source rpm that most closely matches your kernel, which IIRC was a RHEL5 kernel, so get the lustre-source for the 2.6.18-whatever kernel. > Thank you very much for your help. NP. b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
