On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 10:49 -0700, David Brown wrote: > You might also want to pass this onto the pkg-lustre maintainers site.
Yes, good idea. I have posted a message there seeking input. > Also their svn repository for what patches they use for things > svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-lustre Yeah. Their and my origin appear to be the same. As I mentioned in my posting to their list, we need to be able to produce all (patchless client at least) required packages from unprivileged "dpkg-buildpackage" and the use of modules-assistant in their debian/rules precludes that from every which way I can figure. > It might be prudent to let them know what you plan on doing for debian > support so you can not step on each others toes. Indeed. I don't like re-inventing wheels either. For anyone who doesn't care to follow the pkg-lustre list, the bug in our bugzilla which has my patch as well as some discussion is 19721. b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
