On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 16:50 -0700, Robert Read wrote: > > What configure options did you use when you built lustre? I think "-- > with-ldiskfsprogs" will configure lustre to use these names, however > the standard version the e2fs utils doesn't use this naming scheme.
If the --with-ldiskfsprogs was indeed used, perhaps/probably, configure should check that ldiskfsprogs was installed on the build system. Additionally, the Requires: tags in the resulting RPM should probably be changed to ldiskfsprogs from e2fsprogs, if that is not already being done. Perhaps Josephine could file a bug to those effects. Given that having the ldiskfsprogs flavour of the utilities installed is strictly a run-time requirement, perhaps the above configure enhancement not be so strict, but certainly the latter, the RPM requirement, should be. If Josephine had installed resulting RPMs, that would have been her signal that things were not quite aligning. If configure is not so strict, it could at least warn about the missing utilities. b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
