On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 08:46 -0400, Robin Humble wrote: > > Lustre: 13800:0:(o2iblnd_cb.c:459:kiblnd_rx_complete()) Rx from > 10.8.30....@o2ib failed: 5 > Lustre: 13799:0:(o2iblnd_cb.c:459:kiblnd_rx_complete()) Rx from > 10.8.30....@o2ib failed: 5 > Lustre: 615:0:(o2iblnd_cb.c:2384:kiblnd_reconnect()) 10.8.30....@o2ib: > retrying (version negotiation), 12, 11, queue_dep: 8, max_frag: 256, > msg_size: 4096 > Lustre: mgc10.8.30....@o2ib: Reactivating import > Lustre: 13797:0:(o2iblnd_cb.c:459:kiblnd_rx_complete()) Rx from > 10.8.30....@o2ib failed: 5 > Lustre: 13798:0:(o2iblnd_cb.c:459:kiblnd_rx_complete()) Rx from > 10.8.30....@o2ib failed: 5 > Lustre: 615:0:(o2iblnd_cb.c:2384:kiblnd_reconnect()) 10.8.30....@o2ib: > retrying (version negotiation), 12, 11, queue_dep: 8, max_frag: 256, > msg_size: 4096 > Lustre: Client system-client has started > Lustre: 13798:0:(o2iblnd_cb.c:459:kiblnd_rx_complete()) Rx from > 10.8.30....@o2ib failed: 5 > ... last message repeated 17 times ... > Lustre: 615:0:(o2iblnd_cb.c:2384:kiblnd_reconnect()) 10.8.30....@o2ib: > retrying (version negotiation), 12, 11, queue_dep: 8, max_frag: 256, > msg_size: 4096 > Lustre: 615:0:(o2iblnd_cb.c:2384:kiblnd_reconnect()) 10.8.30....@o2ib: > retrying (version negotiation), 12, 11, queue_dep: 8, max_frag: 256, > msg_size: 4096 > Lustre: 13798:0:(o2iblnd_cb.c:459:kiblnd_rx_complete()) Rx from > 10.8.30....@o2ib failed: 5 > Lustre: 615:0:(o2iblnd_cb.c:2384:kiblnd_reconnect()) 10.8.30....@o2ib: > retrying (version negotiation), 12, 11, queue_dep: 8, max_frag: 256, > msg_size: 4096 > Lustre: 615:0:(o2iblnd_cb.c:2384:kiblnd_reconnect()) 10.8.30....@o2ib: > retrying (version negotiation), 12, 11, queue_dep: 8, max_frag: 256, > msg_size: 4096 > Lustre: 13797:0:(o2iblnd_cb.c:459:kiblnd_rx_complete()) Rx from > 10.8.30....@o2ib failed: 5 > Lustre: 615:0:(o2iblnd_cb.c:2384:kiblnd_reconnect()) 10.8.30....@o2ib: > retrying (version negotiation), 12, 11, queue_dep: 8, max_frag: 256, > msg_size: 4096 > Lustre: 615:0:(o2iblnd_cb.c:2384:kiblnd_reconnect()) 10.8.30....@o2ib: > retrying (version negotiation), 12, 11, queue_dep: 8, max_frag: 256, > msg_size: 4096 > Lustre: 615:0:(o2iblnd_cb.c:2384:kiblnd_reconnect()) 10.8.30....@o2ib: > retrying (version negotiation), 12, 11, queue_dep: 8, max_frag: 256, > msg_size: 4096 > Lustre: 615:0:(o2iblnd_cb.c:2384:kiblnd_reconnect()) 10.8.30....@o2ib: > retrying (version negotiation), 12, 11, queue_dep: 8, max_frag: 256, > msg_size: 4096 > Lustre: 13800:0:(o2iblnd_cb.c:459:kiblnd_rx_complete()) Rx from > 10.8.30....@o2ib failed: 5
These are all LND errors. What versions of OFED are you using on each end? > looks like it succeeds in the end, but only after a struggle. Is it completely stable and performant after the struggle? Do the error messages stop? > BTW, should I be using cvs tag v1_8_1_RC1 instead of b_release_1_8_1? > I'm confused about which is closest to the final 1.8.1 :-/ b_release_1_8_1 is the branch and v1_8_1_RC1 is the tag (i.e. snapshot in time from the branch) which is getting tested from that branch which has the potential to become 1.8.1 if the testing pans out. It is entirely possible that even when v1_8_1_RCn becomes the final release, there will be patches dangling on the tip of b_release_1_8_1 that are not release blockers but there in case we need a 1.8.1.1. So the choice is yours. If you want to be using exactly what could potentially be the GA release, you should stick to using the most recent tags. If you want to test ahead of what could be the GA, use the branch tip. b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
