On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 12:34 -0400, Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR) wrote: > I am sure this response is not going to come with any amount of surprise however...
> you should HAVE ipv6 support. Indeed we should. However, we have a long list of stuff that we should have. What we do have is a finite resource to try to empty that list. > you would now have another reason lustre is "better". Indeed. There is lots on that list that would make Lustre "better" and many of them would provide a more immediate "bang" than ipv6 support. We always have to balance the items on that list with what will provide the widest customer impact. We are always very welcome to and appreciative of patches though. b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
