On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 20:41 +0200, Nick Jennings wrote: > Hi everyone, Hi,
> I was wondering if there was any documentation specific to upgrading > lustre 1.6.x branch to 1.8.x branch. rpm -Uvh ... > All the docs I could find were in > regard to 1.4.x -> 1.6.x Right. Because for 1.4->1.6 there were steps beyond simply installing packages to upgrade. > Also, after the upgrade I likely won't be able to perform any more > upgrades for about a year. As in you cannot even upgrade to bug fix releases? > With this in mind what would be the safer > bet? (stability more important that performance): > - stick with 1.6.x branch (upgrade to 1.6.7.2) Given that 1.8 has been out a few months now and IIRC we committed to supporting 1.6 for a year after 1.8 was released, that could put you beyond EOL for 1.6. But if you really do mean you don't intend to even do bugfix upgrades, maybe that's moot anyway. > - upgrade to 1.8.0.1 > - upgrade to 1.8.1 Well, 1.6.7.2 has had a longer "soak time" and still not had any bugs come up that are critical enough for us to consider another 1.6 release. Maybe that speaks for itself. I guess the call is ultimately yours to make. b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
