On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 19:14 -0500, Mag Gam wrote: > I wish they would really address this problem. We have many OSS which > we simply don't have anymore and it would be nice to remove all of > them.
Of course we are not an unlimited resource and we have to make decisions about where we focus efforts. Certainly what you propose would be a nice-to-have, but it doesn't really affect the functionality, reliability or stability of an installation. As such, it's understandable that such an RFE does not get a very high priority. Lustre is open source and we always welcome patches. b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
