Jeffrey Bennett wrote:
> Last time I checked, LMT was designed for Lustre 1.4. LLNL stopped 
> development of LMT some time ago. Not sure if LMT will work with Lustre 1.8. 
> If somebody has tried, please let everyone know.
> 

Ah, it has moved to Google:
http://code.google.com/p/lmt/

"The current release has been tested with Lustre 1.6.6."
So, yup, seems a bit old. But might be worth looking into.
cliffw

> jab
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org 
> [mailto:lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org] On Behalf Of Cliff White
> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 11:12 AM
> To: Jagga Soorma
> Cc: lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
> Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre Monitoring Tools
> 
> Jagga Soorma wrote:
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> I would like to monitor the performance and usage of my Lustre 
>> filesystem and was wondering what are the commonly used monitoring tools 
>> for this?  Cacti? Nagios?  Any input would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Regards,
>> -Simran
>>
> 
> LLNL's LMT tool is very good. It's available on Sourceforge, afaik.
> cliffw
> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lustre-discuss mailing list
>> Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

Reply via email to