Hi,

I realized that the time server differed much across machines,
there were at least a few hours of difference.
I'm doing the tests and have not been paying attention to time synchronization but now I have aligned the time of all servers and I've configured ntpd service
and the problem no longer occurs.
I can imagine that the cause of the problem was just the time misalignment.
Thank and sorry for the trouble !



Cheers, Stefano


Ing. Stefano Elmopi
Gruppo Darco - Resp. ICT Sistemi
Via Ostiense 131/L Corpo B, 00154 Roma

cell. 3466147165
tel.  0657060500
email:[email protected]

"Ai sensi e per effetti della legge sulla tutela della riservatezza personale (D.lgs n. 196/2003), questa @mail e' destinata unicamente alle persone sopra indicate e le informazioni in essa contenute sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. E' proibito leggere, copiare, usare o diffondere il contenuto della presente @mail senza autorizzazione. Se avete ricevuto questo messaggio per
errore, siete pregati di rispedire la stessa al mittente. Grazie"

Il giorno 20/mag/10, alle ore 13:28, Johann Lombardi ha scritto:

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 12:29:41PM +0200, Stefano Elmopi wrote:
Hi Andreas
My version of Lustre 1.8.3
Sorry for my bad English but I used the wrong word, "crash" is not the
right word.
I try to explain better, I start copying a large file on the file system
and while the copy process continues, I reboot the server OSS,
and the copy process enters state "- stalled -".
I expected that once the server back online, the copy process to resume
normal
and complete copy of the file, instead the copy process fault.
Therefore the copy process that goes wrong, Lustre continues to perform
good.

May 19 13:46:31 mdt01prdpom kernel: LustreError: 167-0: This client was
evicted by lustre01-OST0000; in progress operations using this service
will fail.

The cp process failed because the client got evicted by the OSS.
We need to look at the OSS logs to figure out the root cause of
the eviction.

Johann

_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

Reply via email to