On 26/05/10 17:25, Ramiro Alba Queipo wrote: > On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 16:48 +0100, Guy Coates wrote: > >>>> One thing to watch out for in your kernel configs is to make sure that: >>>> >>>> CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES=N >>> >>> OK. But the question is if this issue still applies for lustre-1.8.3 and >>> SLES kernel linux-2.6.27.39-0.3.1.tar.bz2. I mean, is quite surprising >>> that if this problems persist, Oracle is offering lustre packages for >>> SLES11 with CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES=y ??????? >>> I am just about to start testing, so I'd like to clarify this. >> >> The binary SLES packages are fine; it is the source packages that may be >> problematic, depending on your config. There is a bug filed against this > > Sorry Guy. May be there is something I am missing, but SLES11 rpm kernel > server packages for lustre-1.8.3 are created using a config with > ONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES=y (See yourself on the attachement
You are entirely correct. Cheers, Guy -- Dr Guy Coates, Informatics System Group The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1HH, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 834244 ex 6925 Fax: +44 (0)1223 496802 -- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE. _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
