On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 16:48 +0200, Alessandro Luccaroni - Diennea wrote: > > It seems like the "configure" always detect a patched kernel.
It won't if you point it at the kernel-devel for a non-patched kernel. > I tested it on a patched client node rebooted into the standard redhat > kernel, on a RHEL 5.5 and on a fresh RHEL 5.4 installation: Not really sure what you are saying there. Sorry. > [r...@lustreclient3 lustre-1.8.3]# ./configure > --with-linux=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/build > [r...@lustreclient3 lustre-1.8.3]# make rpms > [r...@lustreclient3 lustre-1.8.3]# ls -l /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/ > total 38656 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4712160 Jul 8 16:09 > lustre-1.8.3-2.6.18_164.el5_201007081603.x86_64.rpm > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 11097838 Jul 8 16:10 > lustre-debuginfo-1.8.3-2.6.18_164.el5_201007081603.x86_64.rpm > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 15040050 Jul 8 16:10 > lustre-modules-1.8.3-2.6.18_164.el5_201007081603.x86_64.rpm > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5509072 Jul 8 16:10 > lustre-source-1.8.3-2.6.18_164.el5_201007081603.x86_64.rpm > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3152499 Jul 8 16:10 > lustre-tests-1.8.3-2.6.18_164.el5_201007081603.x86_64.rpm > [r...@lustreclient3 lustre-1.8.3]# uname -a > Linux lustreclient3.diennea.lan 2.6.18-164.el5 #1 SMP Tue Aug 18 > 15:51:48 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Those are all patchless client RPMs despite the lack of the tag "client" in them, as I explained in my previous message. b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
