I've read through the 'More Complicated Configurations' section in the
manual and it says as part of setting up failover with
two(active/passive) MDS/MGS and two OSSs(active/active) to use the
following:

mkfs.lustre --fsname=lustre --ost --failnode=192.168.5....@tcp0
--mgsnode=192.168.5....@tcp0,192.168.5....@tcp0
/dev/lustre-ost1-dg1/lv1

Yet it fails when I try to mount:

kjournald starting.  Commit interval 5 seconds
LDISKFS FS on dm-9, internal journal
LDISKFS-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
kjournald starting.  Commit interval 5 seconds
LDISKFS FS on dm-9, internal journal
LDISKFS-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
LDISKFS-fs: file extents enabled
LDISKFS-fs: mballoc enabled
Lustre: 5984:0:(client.c:1463:ptlrpc_expire_one_request()) @@@ Request
x1343800163193112 sent from mgc192.168.5....@tcp to NID
192.168.5....@tcp 5s ago has timed out (5s prior to deadline).
  r...@ffff810118a53400 x1343800163193112/t0
o250->[email protected]@tcp_0:26/25 lens 368/584 e 0 to 1 dl
1282144240 ref 1 fl Rpc:N/0/0 rc 0/0
LustreError: 4854:0:(obd_mount.c:1095:server_start_targets()) Required
registration failed for lustre-OSTffff: -4
LustreError: 4854:0:(obd_mount.c:1653:server_fill_super()) Unable to
start targets: -4
LustreError: 4854:0:(obd_mount.c:1436:server_put_super()) no obd lustre-OSTffff
LustreError: 4854:0:(obd_mount.c:147:server_deregister_mount())
lustre-OSTffff not registered
LDISKFS-fs: mballoc: 0 blocks 0 reqs (0 success)
LDISKFS-fs: mballoc: 0 extents scanned, 0 goal hits, 0 2^N hits, 0
breaks, 0 lost
LDISKFS-fs: mballoc: 0 generated and it took 0
LDISKFS-fs: mballoc: 0 preallocated, 0 discarded

Reading that makes me think its looking for 192.168.5.105 to be an
active MGS/MDS as well as 192.168.5.104(which is the primary).

David

-- 
Personally, I liked the university. They gave us money and facilities,
we didn't have to produce anything! You've never been out of college!
You don't know what it's like out there! I've worked in the private
sector. They expect results. -Ray Ghostbusters
_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

Reply via email to