Hi

Many thanks for the reply!

The MDT is only 5% used.

OST's are all around 30%.

I have run the full series of e2fsck's.

Have been running 1.8.1 as it was built with weak dependencies to 
Infiniband, and I needed OFED 1.5 for my hardware....

But, I have recently been told by Marco Gomes (based on a recent forum 
discussion?) that 1.8.3 seems to work with OFED 1.5.2-rc2.

Will try to upgrade and see...

Thanks and kindest regards!

Fourie




On 18/08/2010 16:27, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On 2010-08-18, at 4:14, Fourie Joubert<[email protected]>  wrote:
>> Just reporting some more detail about the soft lockup error I have been
>> getting:
>>
>> I am running Lustre 1.8.1, kernels are from the Lustre distro.
> Firstly, there is a known corruption bug in 1.8.1, you should ar minimum 
> upgrade to 1.8.1.1, but it may be that this problem is fixed in a newer 
> release.
>
>
>> Aug 18 12:14:11 wonkofs kernel:  [<ffffffff88b7007f>] 
>> :ldiskfs:ldiskfs_get_group_desc+0x3b/0xb0
>> Aug 18 12:14:11 wonkofs kernel:  [<ffffffff88b7007f>]
>> :ldiskfs:ldiskfs_find_reverse+0x2f/0xa0
>> Aug 18 12:14:11 wonkofs kernel:  [<ffffffff88b78f26>]
>> :ldiskfs:ldiskfs_new_inode_wantedi+0x46/0x80
> This is getting stuck looking for a free inode. Is there free space in the 
> MDT filesystem? Have you run a full e2fsck?
>
> I do recall some changes is this code a while ago, but I don't recall what 
> version it was in offhand.
>
> Cheers, Andreas
>


-- 
--------------
Prof Fourie Joubert
Associate Professor
Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Unit
Department of Biochemistry
University of Pretoria
[email protected]
http://www.bi.up.ac.za
Tel. +27-12-420-5802
Fax. +27-12-420-5800

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message and attachments are subject to a disclaimer. Please refer
to www.it.up.ac.za/documentation/governance/disclaimer/ for full details.

_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

Reply via email to