On 2010-09-24, at 19:10, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On 2010-09-24, at 18:20, burlen wrote: >> To be sure I understand this, is it correct that each OST has its own pool >> of service threads? So system wide number of service threads is bound by >> oss_max_threads*num_osts? > > Actuall, the current oss_max_threads tunable is for the whole OSS (as the > name implies). It would be quite useful, in fact, to have a tuneable that > like oss_ost_threads (or similar) that is what you suggest. > > If you have some time and C coding skills, implementing this would be fairly > easily done (see lustre/ost/ost_handler.c and the oss_num_threads tunable > handling therein, along with .../lproc_ost.c).
In fact, I just noticed that there is such a tunable in a new patch already in bug 22516. Sorry for the confusion. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Lustre Technical Lead Oracle Corporation Canada Inc. _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
