A lot of the data is overlaps. The LMT tools do provide more fine grained stats about MDS/T activity though.
The ganglia + collectl setup is nice because it presents the lustre data in the context of the rest of the machine activity and also provides multiple levels of resolution (from the cluster of machines down to the specific services). I wouldn't say the LMT project is moribund. 2.4 was released recently. It could use some more documentation though, especially in the cerebro area. All in all more data about, and views of, the systems is better than less. On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Larry <[email protected]> wrote: > the latest lmt (lmt-2.6.4-2) is updated on Sep 17, 2010. Why say moribund? > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Andreas Davour <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I ask because the lmt project seem to be quite moribund. Anyone else out >> there >> doing something? >> >> /andreas >> -- >> Systems Engineer >> PDC Center for High Performance Computing >> CSC School of Computer Science and Communication >> KTH Royal Institute of Technology >> SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden >> Phone: 087906658 >> "A satellite, an earring, and a dust bunny are what made America great!" >> _______________________________________________ >> Lustre-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >> > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
