On 10/16/10 12:31 AM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
If the old OST is still accessible, you can copy the last_rcvd file and 
O/0/LAST_ID file, copy them over to the reformatted OST, and it should take on 
the identity of the old OST.
The disk is not still accessible. and I am going to reuse the same OST once its repaired.
The only other thing that identifies the filesystem is the label, which should 
be set  by mkfs.lustre if the index is specified.
What exactly do you use for this index parameter? Can you give me a concrete example?

lisa

Cheers, Andreas

On 2010-10-14, at 13:22, Lisa Giacchetti<[email protected]>  wrote:
I am looking a definitive list of steps a lustre clustre admin should take to 
recover from the following scenario:
   1) an OST in the cluster has had a permanent data failure: The data can not 
be recovered but
       device itself will fixed. Please assume that the device is NOT mounted 
any more on the OSS it
       was being served from and therefore is NOT listed in the "lctl dl" 
command on that OSS.
   2) data lost is not needed and there are no backups of it
   3) It would be beneficial to be able to replace the OST with as the same 
device. (ie reuse the index)
       but please include what is used in the "--index" parameter of each 
command as the documentation
       on this is severely lacking
   4) running mgs and mdt on two separate servers
   5) there is no fail-over of any kind set up

I have tried to find the appropriate steps to take  and commands to use from 
within the docs and
have been unsuccessful. So Unsuccessful that I have had to remake my entire 
cluster.
If you need more clarification on the scenario before being able to tell me 
what steps to take - please
ask for the info you need.

Anyone?

Lisa Giacchetti

<lisa.vcf>
_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

<<attachment: lisa.vcf>>

_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

Reply via email to