On Wednesday, October 20, 2010, Charland, Denis wrote: > Brian J. Murrell wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 21:00 -0400, Edward Walter wrote: > > > > > > This is why the recommendations in this thread have continued to be > > using a number of data disks that divides evenly into 1MB (i.e. powers > > of 2: 2, 4, 8, etc.). So for RAID6: 4+2 or 8+2, etc. > > What about RAID5?
Personally I don't lile raid5 too much, but with raid5 it is obviously +1 instead of +2 Cheers, Bernd -- Bernd Schubert DataDirect Networks _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss