You're asking questions! No chance we can upgrade the Lustre version again for the next couple of months anyway and it appears to be no problem to make the stupid embedded things use NFSv3.
So tar, I would say. Tina On 12/11/10 16:22, Bernd Schubert wrote: > Hello Tina, > > On 11/12/2010 03:44 PM, Tina Friedrich wrote: >> Hello again, >> >> nope, running with / exporting from a server with the patched kernel >> running does not change this behaviour at all. mountvers=3 works, 1 and >> 2 don't. > > I can reproduce it, so NFSv2 support got broken. Which issue has higher > priority, tar or NFSv2? > > > Cheers, > Bernd > -- Tina Friedrich, Computer Systems Administrator, Diamond Light Source Ltd Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus - 01235 77 8442 -- This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail. Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd. Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message. Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
