Actually note that it is conflicting with existing ext4progs, not ext2, so should not be all that hard. Besides, lustre-enabled ext2 should have all the stuff that's already in ext4progs I would imagine.
On Nov 22, 2010, at 11:05 PM, Alexey Lyashkov wrote: > removing e2fsprogs from live system is difficult, because have many > dependences. > in that case better to check if e2fsprogs-devel package installed, and use > force update for both package - e2fsprogs / e2fsprogs-devel (if need). > but root case of that problem - Oracle use bad name for that package. > > Kevin - can you please add that issue in bugzilla and assign to Brian to fix > it? this should be trivial fix in spec file + lbuild. > > > On Nov 23, 2010, at 06:29, Kevin Van Maren wrote: > >> Because of the naming convention, it doesn't recognize the Lustre one as an >> "upgrade". >> >> Remove the redhat one with "rpm -e" first (or less desirably, use --force to >> install over the top of the redhat one) >> >> Kevin >> >> >> On Nov 22, 2010, at 7:49 PM, Sze Chuan <sze.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I couldn't install e2fsprogs using the rpm from the lustre website. Any >>> idea to go about doing it? >>> >>> Here's my output: >>> >>> rpm -Uvh e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.oel5.x86_64.rpm >>> Preparing... ########################################### >>> [100%] >>> file /sbin/fsck.ext4 from install of >>> e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package >>> e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >>> file /sbin/fsck.ext4dev from install of >>> e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package >>> e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >>> file /sbin/mkfs.ext4 from install of >>> e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package >>> e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >>> file /sbin/mkfs.ext4dev from install of >>> e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package >>> e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >>> file /usr/share/man/man8/fsck.ext4.8.gz from install of >>> e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package >>> e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >>> file /usr/share/man/man8/fsck.ext4dev.8.gz from install of >>> e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package >>> e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >>> file /usr/share/man/man8/mkfs.ext4.8.gz from install of >>> e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package >>> e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >>> file /usr/share/man/man8/mkfs.ext4dev.8.gz from install of >>> e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package >>> e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Alexey Lyashkov >>> <alexey.lyash...@clusterstor.com> wrote: >>> is you install e2fsprogs from lustre site? >>> looks not. >>> >>> On Nov 22, 2010, at 12:15, Sze Chuan wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I'm new to Lustre and had trouble creating a MGS/MDT filesystem on the >>>> block device. I entered the following command "mkfs.lustre --fsname=lustre >>>> --mdt --mgs /dev/VolGroup00/MDS" but got the following error at the >>>> output. >>>> >>>> I'm running Lustre 2.0 on OEL 5.4 x86_64. >>>> >>>> Output: >>>> >>>> Permanent disk data: >>>> Target: lustre-MDTffff >>>> Index: unassigned >>>> Lustre FS: lustre >>>> Mount type: ldiskfs >>>> Flags: 0x75 >>>> (MDT MGS needs_index first_time update ) >>>> Persistent mount opts: iopen_nopriv,user_xattr,errors=remount-ro >>>> Parameters: >>>> >>>> checking for existing Lustre data: not found >>>> device size = 4096MB >>>> formatting backing filesystem ldiskfs on /dev/VolGroup00/MDS >>>> target name lustre-MDTffff >>>> 4k blocks 1048576 >>>> options -J size=160 -i 4096 -I 512 -q -O >>>> dir_index,dirdata,uninit_bg -F >>>> mkfs_cmd = mke2fs -j -b 4096 -L lustre-MDTffff -J size=160 -i 4096 -I 512 >>>> -q -O dir_index,dirdata,uninit_bg -F /dev/VolGroup00/MDS 1048576 >>>> Invalid filesystem option set: dir_index,dirdata,uninit_bg >>>> >>>> mkfs.lustre FATAL: Unable to build fs /dev/VolGroup00/MDS (256) >>>> >>>> mkfs.lustre FATAL: mkfs failed 256 >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>>> >>>> Sze Chuan >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Lustre-discuss mailing list >>>> Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org >>>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Lustre-discuss mailing list >>> Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org >>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss