What does that imply for sites migrating from 1.8 to 2.1? Presumably some sites will have both 1.8 and 2.1 filesystems; will those sites need to run 2.0 on the clients to mount both FS versions concurrently?
-- Mike Shuey On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Andreas Dilger <adil...@whamcloud.com> wrote: > While 2.0 was submitted to quite heavy testing at Oracle before it's > release, it has not been widely deployed for production at this point. All > of the develoment and maintenance effort has gone into the next release > (2.1) which is not released yet. I think that 2.1 will represent a much more > sustainable target for production usage, when it is released. Until that > happens, I would only recommend 2.0 for evaluation usage, and especially for > sites new to Lustre that they stay on the tried-and-true 1.8 code base. > > Cheers, Andreas > On 2011-01-11, at 12:56, Samuel Aparicio <sapari...@bccrc.ca> wrote: > > thanks for this note. > is lustre 2.0 regarded as stable for production? > Professor Samuel Aparicio BM BCh PhD FRCPath > Nan and Lorraine Robertson Chair UBC/BC Cancer Agency > 675 West 10th, Vancouver V5Z 1L3, Canada. > office: +1 604 675 8200 cellphone: +1 604 762 5178: lab > website http://molonc.bccrc.ca > > > > > On Jan 7, 2011, at 5:11 PM, Colin Faber wrote: > > Hi, > > I've built several against 2.6.18-194.17.1.el5 kernels without problem > so I would think you can probably get away with 0.1 as well. > > -cf > > > On 01/07/2011 06:05 PM, Samuel Aparicio wrote: > > Is it known if Lustre 2.0 GA will run with 2.6.18-194.17.1.0.1.el5 > > kernels. The test matrix has only the 164 kernel as the latest tested. > > Professor Samuel Aparicio BM BCh PhD FRCPath > > Nan and Lorraine Robertson Chair UBC/BC Cancer Agency > > 675 West 10th, Vancouver V5Z 1L3, Canada. > > office: +1 604 675 8200 cellphone: +1 604 762 5178: lab website > > http://molonc.bccrc.ca <http://molonc.bccrc.ca/> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Lustre-discuss mailing list > > Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > > _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss