On 2011-02-01, at 11:38, Jason Rappleye <[email protected]> wrote: > I heard through the grapevine that you suggest not using "too few" flex_bgs > on an ext4 filesystem. Can you elaborate on what might be a reasonable > number, and why?
My gut feeling is that a flex_bg factor of 256 may give the best tradeoff of performance and configurability for a hybrid storage device. That will allow bitmaps and itables to be multiples of 1MB sizes, and with careful tuning they can also be aligned on 1MB boundaries. It means that 1/256th of the filesystem would be allocated on SSD storage (4GB per TB) which I think is totally reasonable (64GB for a 16TB filesystem), while at the same time avoiding too complex an LV layout (512 SSD regions for a 16TB filesystem). In the end we need to do the testing to know what the best tradeoff is. Cheers, Andreas _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
