Make sure that the kernel you are running matches up with the rpms you installed then?
[ball@umt3int01:gate01_b]$ rpm -qa|grep lustre lustre-client-1.8.4-2.6.18_194.17.4.el5.x86_64 lustre-client-modules-1.8.4-2.6.18_194.17.4.el5.x86_64 [ball@umt3int01:gate01_b]$ uname -r 2.6.18-194.17.4.el5 bob On 2/22/2011 3:03 PM, Xiang, Yang wrote: > But my mount command is failing and that's the issue: > mount -t lustre 192.168.0.2@tcp0:/temp /lustre > mount.lustre: mount 192.168.0.2@tcp0:/temp at /lustre failed: No such > device > Are the lustre modules loaded? > Check /etc/modprobe.conf and /proc/filesystems > Note 'alias lustre llite' should be removed from modprobe.conf > > And yes I created the /lustre mount point. > > And I tried to add to the fstab to avoid "sunrpc" to take over on boot. > > This is frustrating... > > Thanks, > > Yang > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian J. > Murrell > Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 11:58 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Help! Newbie trying to set up Lustre > network > > On 11-02-22 02:55 PM, Xiang, Yang wrote: >> On the client, I only did: >> "rpm -ivh >> > lustre-client-modules-1.8.52.6.16_60_0.69.1_lustre.1.8.5_smp.x86_64.rpm" >> And >> "rpm -ivh >> lustre-client-1.8.5-2.6.16_60_0.69.1_lustre.1.8.5_smp.x86_64.rpm" > That's fine. > >> Lsmod does not show any lustre modules getting loaded. > Even after you run "mount -t lustre ..."? > >> Do I need to do an "insmod" of some top level client ko? The >> installation guide does not say anything. > On a properly configured and working Linux system, no. The "mount -t > lustre" command should load the lustre modules. > > b. > _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
