1.6.6 gave us lots of problems. We are using 1.8.4 here. Has better tools, for one thing, eg, lfs_migrate.
bob On 5/24/2011 7:37 PM, Mag Gam wrote: > stick with 1.6.6 , its a great release! BTW, why did you decide to > upgrade to 1.8.x? is there a feature you are looking for? > > > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Aaron Everett<aever...@forteds.com> wrote: >> Thanks for the tip. I've already updated with the LU-286 patch, but I'll >> build new rpms with both patches and roll that out too. Since updating with >> the LU-286 patch Lustre has been running cleanly. Thanks for the support and >> the work! >> Aaron >> >> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Johann Lombardi<joh...@whamcloud.com> >> wrote: >>> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 01:57:33PM -0400, Aaron Everett wrote: >>>> Sorry for the noise. I cleaned everything up, untarred a fresh copy of >>> np. BTW, while you are patching the lustre client, you might also want to >>> apply the following patch http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,457 which >>> fixes a memory leak in the same part of the code. >>> >>> Johann >>> -- >>> Johann Lombardi >>> Whamcloud, Inc. >>> www.whamcloud.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lustre-discuss mailing list >> Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org >> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss