On 06/01/2011 08:25 AM, John White wrote:
> Hello Folks,
>       We've got this perl script that performs our purges based on the atime 
> returned from a stat() call.  Over the weekend, it would appear, our script 
> got back millions of corrupted or misreported atimes and, lucky for us, 
> unlinked a whole bunch of files (on the order of 45TB).  The only indication 
> anything might have happened was the following sitting in the dmesg of the 
> lustre client that houses the purge script:
> *snip*
> LustreError: 27061:0:(file.c:3312:ll_inode_revalidate_fini()) failure -2 
> inode 181017071
> LustreError: 27061:0:(file.c:3312:ll_inode_revalidate_fini()) Skipped 19 
> previous similar messages
> LustreError: 13381:0:(file.c:3312:ll_inode_revalidate_fini()) failure -2 
> inode 161973341
> LustreError: 13381:0:(file.c:3312:ll_inode_revalidate_fini()) Skipped 25 
> previous similar messages
> LustreError: 27061:0:(file.c:3312:ll_inode_revalidate_fini()) failure -2 
> inode 162433196
> LustreError: 27061:0:(file.c:3312:ll_inode_revalidate_fini()) Skipped 32 
> previous similar messages
> LustreError: 27061:0:(file.c:3312:ll_inode_revalidate_fini()) failure -2 
> inode 174530765
> LustreError: 27061:0:(file.c:3312:ll_inode_revalidate_fini()) Skipped 33 
> previous similar messages
> *snip*
>
> Any ideas or experience with poorly reported atimes under lustre?
>

https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23766 ?

Slightly different maybe?

David


_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

Reply via email to