Hi Michael, We are one of the customers using it, and so far (about 2 weeks) it's been stable on a ~8700 core cluster. fragmentation statistics as reported by brw_stats look much better than 1.8.2 as an added bonus.
Mark On 06/13/2011 03:11 PM, Joe Landman wrote: > On 06/13/2011 04:07 PM, Michael Di Domenico wrote: >> Joe, >> >> I'm trying to compile 1.8.5 i686/x86_64 on RHEL5.6 with 2.6.8-238 >> kernel. Did you happen to hit this error with your compile? If so >> how did you fix it? Has anyone else seen this? >> >> CC [M] fs/jbd2/journal.o >> fs/jbd2/journal.c:94: error: redefinition of >> ‘__kcrctab_jbd2_log_start_commit’ >> fs/jbd2/journal.c:80: error: previous definition of >> ‘__kcrctab_jbd2_log_start_commit’ was here >> fs/jbd2/journal.c:94: error: redefinition of >> ‘__kstrtab_jbd2_log_start_commit’ >> fs/jbd2/journal.c:80: error: previous definition of >> ‘__kstrtab_jbd2_log_start_commit’ was here >> fs/jbd2/journal.c:94: error: redefinition of >> ‘__ksymtab_jbd2_log_start_commit’ >> fs/jbd2/journal.c:80: error: previous definition of >> ‘__ksymtab_jbd2_log_start_commit’ was here >> make[3]: *** [fs/jbd2/journal.o] Error 1 >> make[2]: *** [fs/jbd2] Error 2 >> make[1]: *** [fs] Error 2 >> make: *** [modules] Error 2 >> > > Hi Michael: > > I had tried 1.8.5 against the newer kernels and ran into problems. > So I pursued using the updated bits. > > For our successful build, I used the updated Centos 5.6 kernel, and > the git repository. You can pull our build from here: > http://download.scalableinformatics.com/lustre/1.8git_build/ if you > wish. Customers are using it, and so far, its looking pretty good. > > Regards, > > Joe > > -- Mark Nelson, HPC Systems Administrator Minnesota Supercomputing Institute Phone: (612)626-4479 Email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
